Compare Ford Focus 4 Wagon vs Volvo V60 II vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 155PS MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 85PS
1.5 EcoBlue 120PS
1.5 EcoBlue 120PS AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
2.0 EcoBlue 150PS
2.0 EcoBlue 150PS AT
Focus ST
Focus ST AT
Focus ST Diesel
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1566.0 mm / 61.7 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
50%
62%
32%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Focus ST still available
- Improved, cleaner styling
- Better handling characteristics
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent interior appointment
- Decent build quality
- Independent rear suspensions
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Only available with small engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.