Compare Ford Mondeo 3 Wagon vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift vs Hyundai i30 CW

Variants
1.6 110PS
1.6 125PS
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.2 TDCi
2.3
2.5
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start
1.4
1.6 5MT
1.6 6MT
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 6MT
1.6 CRDi 5MT
1.6 CRDi AT
1.6 CRDi 5MT
1.6 CRDi 6MT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CRDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
415 L / 14.7 cu-ft ~ 1395 L / 49.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1565 mm / 61.6 in
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
37%
32%
Pros
  • Volvo I5 engine was interesting
  • Rather reliable powertrain
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Higher output engines made available
  • Small turning circle
  • High engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Design didn't age well
  • Further downsized engine lineup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Old 4-speed auto gearbox

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.