Compare Volvo XC70 III facelift vs Volvo V60 vs Fiat Tipo Wagon
Variants
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD
D4 181PS AWD AT
D5 215PS AWD
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 220PS AWD AT
T5 254PS AWD AT
T5 AT
T6 AWD AT
2.0T
D3
D3 AT
D3 S/S
D5 205PS
D5 205PS AT
D5 205PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD
DRIVe
DRIVe AT
T3
T3 AT
T4
T4 AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5
T5 AT
T6 AWD AT
1.3 16V MultiJet II
1.3 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.4 16V FIRE
1.4 16V FIRE Euro6d
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.6 16V E.torQ AT
1.6 16V MultiJet II
1.6 16V MultiJet II DDCT
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
575 L / 20.3 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
692 L / 24.4 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/65 R16
205/55 R16, 225/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1604 mm / 63.1 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4838 mm / 190.5 in
4628 mm / 182.2 in
4571 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1865 mm / 73.4 in
1792 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2815 mm / 110.8 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2638 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
33%
33%
24%
Pros
- Last change to get Volvo's great I5 and I6 engines
- Manual transmission still available
- Very interesting I5 and I6 (in T6) engines
- Good, clean interior design
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Still very ugly
- MacPherson strut front suspension
- Appears somewhat cramped
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.