Compare Volvo V70 III facelift vs Peugeot 207 SW vs Peugeot 308 SW II

Variants
D2
D2 AT
D3
D3 AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D5
D5 AT
D5 AWD AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 AWD AT
1.4
1.4 VTi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 RC
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.2 PureTech 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 102PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 PureTech AT
1.6 THP
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS 2017-2018
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177PS AT
GT 1.6 THP
GT 2.0 BlueHDi AT
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 2017-2018

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
555 L / 19.6 cu-ft ~ 1580 L / 55.8 cu-ft
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1547 mm / 60.9 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
4814 mm / 189.5 in
4156 mm / 163.6 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1907 mm / 75.1 in
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1461.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheelbase
2816 mm / 110.9 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
60%
3%
15%
Pros
  • Good engine lineup remained available
  • Cleaner, more imposing design
  • Easy to DIY
  • Parts are cheap
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Not ugly anymore
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.