Compare Volvo V70 II facelift vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Volvo V60 II
Variants
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.4 140PS
2.4 140PS AT
2.4 140PS Bi-Fuel
2.4 140PS Bi-Fuel AT
2.4 170PS
2.4 170PS AT
2.4D 126PS
2.4D 163PS
2.4D 163PS AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.5T AWD AT
D5 185PS
D5 185PS AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
T5
T5 AT
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
485 L / 17.1 cu-ft ~ 1641 L / 58.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Length
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4761 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1804 mm / 71.0 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2755 mm / 108.5 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
50%
36%
62%
Pros
- Much better looking
- More powerful I5 engines
- New transmission options
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.