Compare Opel Insignia A Sports Tourer vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Opel Vectra C Caravan

Variants
1.4 T 140PS
1.6 115PS
1.6 T 180PS
1.8 140PS
2.0 BiTurbo CDTI
2.0 BiTurbo CDTI AT
2.0 CDTI 110PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS AT
2.0 T 220PS
2.0 T 220PS 4x4
2.0 T 220PS 4x4 AT
2.0 T 220PS AT
2.0 T 220PS Ethanol
2.0 T 250PS 4x4
2.0 T 250PS 4x4 AT
2.8 T 260PS 4x4
2.8 T 260PS 4x4 AT
OPC 2.8 T 325PS 4x4
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1530 L / 54.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
GM Epsilon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4560 mm / 179.5 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheelbase
2737 mm / 107.8 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
88 g/km
222 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
39%
28%
27%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Rather handsome design
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Better-looking than the sedan
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson front suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
  • Use of CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.