Compare Opel Astra K Sports Tourer vs Subaru Outback 2 vs Subaru Outback 6
Variants
1.0 T 105PS
1.0 T 105PS Easytronic
1.0 T 90PS
1.2 T 110PS
1.2 T 130PS
1.2 T 145PS
1.4
1.4 150PS
1.4 150PS AT
1.4 T 110PS
1.4 T 125PS
1.4 T 145PS CVT
1.4 T 150PS
1.4 T 150PS AT
1.5d 105PS
1.5d 122PS
1.5d 122PS AT
1.6 BiTurbo 150PS
1.6 CDTi 110PS
1.6 CDTi 136PS
1.6 CDTi 136PS AT
1.6 CDTi 95PS
1.6 CDTi Bi-Turbo
1.6 T
1.6 T AT
1.6d 110PS
1.6d 136PS
1.6d 136PS AT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
2.5 182 CVT
2.5 188 CVT
2.4T
2.4T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1630 L / 57.6 cu-ft
459 L / 16.2 cu-ft ~ 1649 L / 58.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent torsion beam
Helical spring
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1545 mm / 60.8 in
Size | Length
4702 mm / 185.1 in
4730 mm / 186.2 in
Size | Width
1809 mm / 71.2 in | 2042 mm / 80.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1871 mm / 73.7 in (mirror folded)
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2662 mm / 104.8 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
169 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Torque
223 Nm / 164.5 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2003
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
34%
54%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Some interesting flat-4 and flat-6 engines
- Subaru's signature symmetric AWD
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good handlding characteristics
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Still uses semi-independent rear suspension
- Rather ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.