Compare Opel Astra K Sports Tourer vs Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate

Opel Astra K / Vauxhall Astra / Holden Astra Sports Tourer (B16) Station Wagon (2015-2021)

Toyota Avensis 3 (T270) Station Wagon (2009-2011)

Renault Laguna 2 Estate (X74) Station Wagon (2001-2008)

Opel | Cars

Toyota | Cars

Renault | Cars

Variants

1.0 T 105PS

1.0 T 105PS Easytronic

1.0 T 90PS

1.2 T 110PS

1.2 T 130PS

1.2 T 145PS

1.4

1.4 150PS

1.4 150PS AT

1.4 T 110PS

1.4 T 125PS

1.4 T 145PS CVT

1.4 T 150PS

1.4 T 150PS AT

1.5d 105PS

1.5d 122PS

1.5d 122PS AT

1.6 BiTurbo 150PS

1.6 CDTi 110PS

1.6 CDTi 136PS

1.6 CDTi 136PS AT

1.6 CDTi 95PS

1.6 CDTi Bi-Turbo

1.6 T

1.6 T AT

1.6d 110PS

1.6d 136PS

1.6d 136PS AT

1.6

1.8

1.8 CVT

2.0

2.0 CVT

2.2 D-4D

2.2 D-4D AT

2.2 D-CAT

1.5 dCi 101PS

1.5 dCi 105PS

1.5 dCi 82PS

1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4

1.6 107PS

1.6 112PS

1.8 120PS

1.9 dCi 100PS

1.9 dCi 107PS

1.9 dCi 120PS

2.0 136PS

2.0 Turbo 170PS

2.0 Turbo 165PS

2.0 IDE 140PS

2.2 dCi 150PS

2.2 dCi 150PS AT

3.0 207PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1630 L / 57.6 cu-ft

543 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 1609 L / 56.8 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent torsion beam

Double-wishbone

Semi-independent rear suspension

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.2 ft

10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height

1480 mm / 58.3 in

1443 mm / 56.8 in

Size | Length

4702 mm / 185.1 in

4765 mm / 187.6 in

4695 mm / 184.8 in

Size | Width

1809 mm / 71.2 in | 2042 mm / 80.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1871 mm / 73.7 in (mirror folded)

1810 mm / 71.3 in

1772 mm / 69.8 in

Track Width | Front

1550.0 mm / 61.0 in

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

1480.0 mm / 58.3 in

Wheelbase

2662 mm / 104.8 in

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2740 mm / 107.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.26

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Production

Availability

2009 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score

34%

10%

Pros

Good 0.26 drag coefficient

Improved suspension setup
Newer automatic transmission
More fuel efficient
Elegant styling

Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Still uses semi-independent rear suspension

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.