Compare Opel Vectra C Caravan vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Opel Vectra C Caravan
Variants
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
GM Epsilon
GM Epsilon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
Size | Width
1798 mm / 70.8 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
222 g/km
222 g/km
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
30%
27%
Pros
- Better-looking than the sedan
- Very low fuel consumption
- Superb reliability
- More modern design
- Better-looking than the sedan
Cons
- Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Use of CVT
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor handling
- Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Use of CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.