HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 2 Scout vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
2.0 FSI
2.0 TDI
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
580 L / 20.5 cu-ft ~ 1620 L / 57.2 cu-ft
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
660 kg / 1455 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4572 mm / 180.0 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1779 mm / 70.0 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in

Performance

Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2008
2019 ~ 2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
36%
32%
Pros
  • Some recycled black plastic are used
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent interior appointment
  • Decent build quality
  • Independent rear suspensions
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.