Compare Skoda Octavia 3 Combi facelift vs Volkswagen Passat Variant B8 facelift vs Skoda Superb B8 Combi facelift

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.2 TSI
1.4 G-TEC
1.4 G-TEC DSG
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI DSG
1.5 G-TEC DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 MPI
1.6 MPI AT
1.6 TDI 116PS
1.6 TDI 116PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 116PS DSG
1.6 TDI 90PS
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 143PS
2.0 TDI 143PS DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
RS 2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI 4x4 DSG
RS 2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TSI 230PS
RS 2.0 TSI 230PS DSG
RS 2.0 TSI 245PS
RS 2.0 TSI 245PS DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TDI 240 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 4MOTION DSG
GTE
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 120 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
PHEV

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1516 mm / 59.7 in
Size | Length
4773 mm / 187.9 in
4862 mm / 191.4 in
Size | Width
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 2083 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2786 mm / 109.7 in

Performance

Electric Range
66.0 km / 41.0 mi

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.0 mm / 3.1 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
49%
39%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent handling
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.