HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 3 Combi vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 86PS
1.4 G-TEC
1.4 G-TEC DSG
1.4 TSI 140PS
1.4 TSI 140PS DSG
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.6 TDI 105PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS
1.6 TDI 110PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 110PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS GreenLine
1.6 TDI 90PS
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4 DSG
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS DSG
2.0 TDI 184PS 4x4 DSG
RS 2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS DSG
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1814 mm / 71.4 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)

Performance

Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d

Production

Availability
2019 ~ 2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
36%
32%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent interior appointment
  • Decent build quality
  • Independent rear suspensions
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.