HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 3 Combi vs Hyundai i40 Tourer vs Hyundai i30 III Estate

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 86PS
1.4 G-TEC
1.4 G-TEC DSG
1.4 TSI 140PS
1.4 TSI 140PS DSG
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.6 TDI 105PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS
1.6 TDI 110PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 110PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS GreenLine
1.6 TDI 90PS
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4 DSG
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS DSG
2.0 TDI 184PS 4x4 DSG
RS 2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS DSG
1.6 GDi
1.7 CRDi 116PS
1.7 CRDi 136PS
1.7 CRDi 136PS AT
1.7 CRDi 141PS
1.7 CRDi 141PS AT
1.7 VGT AT
2.0 GDi 165PS
2.0 GDi 165PS AT
2.0 GDi 177PS
2.0 GDi 177PS AT
2.0 MPi
2.0 MPi AT
1.0 T-GDI
1.0 T-GDI Euro6d
1.4 MPI
1.4 MPI Euro6d
1.4 T-GDI
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.4 T-GDI Euro6d
1.4 T-GDI Euro6d DCT
1.6 CRDi 110PS
1.6 CRDi 110PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 136PS
1.6 CRDi 136PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 136PS Euro6d
1.6 CRDi 136PS Euro6D DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
602 L / 21.3 cu-ft ~ 1650 L / 58.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Independent, spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1814 mm / 71.4 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Wheelbase
2770 mm / 109.1 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
28%
33%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Lots of space inside
  • Reliable engines
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved engine lineup
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.