Compare Skoda Fabia 3 Combi vs Citroen C5 Estate vs Citroen C5 CrossTourer
Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.2 TSI 110PS
1.2 TSI 110PS DSG
1.2 TSI 90PS
1.4 TDI 105PS
1.4 TDI 90PS
1.4 TDI 90PS DSG
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 HDi 109PS
2.0 HDi 110PS
2.0 HDi 110PS AT
2.0 HDi 90PS
2.0 HPi
2.2 HDi
2.2 HDi AT
3.0
3.0 AT
3.0 Carlsson
2.0 BlueHDi 150hp
2.0 BlueHDi 180hp AT
2.0 HDi
2.0 HDi AT
2.2 HDi AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1395 L / 49.3 cu-ft
563 L / 19.9 cu-ft ~ 1658 L / 58.6 cu-ft
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1462 L / 51.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/45 R18, 245/40 R19
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
12.5 m / 40.9 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1479 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
4257 mm / 167.6 in
4840 mm / 190.6 in
Size | Width
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2096 mm / 82.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheel Size
18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2470 mm / 97.2 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 3
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged commonrail diesel inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
7%
37%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Affordable for its size
- Easy to repair
- Doesn't pretend to go offroad
- Rather fine styling
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible engine reliability
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.