HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Superb B6 Combi vs Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Skoda Superb B8 Combi facelift

Variants
1.4 TSI
1.6 TDI CR DPF
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI CR DPF 138hp
2.0 TDI CR DPF 166hp
2.0 TSI DCT
3.6 FSI AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi DCT
1.7 CRDi
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL Euro6d
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT
2.0 GDI PHEV
2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV
GT Euro6d AT
GT AT
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 120 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
PHEV

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
633 L / 22.4 cu-ft ~ 1865 L / 65.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
Volkswagen A6 (PQ46)

Dimensions

Size | Height
1510 mm / 59.4 in
Size | Length
4838 mm / 190.5 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
4862 mm / 191.4 in
Size | Width
1817 mm / 71.5 in
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1517.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 16
Wheelbase
2761 mm / 108.7 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
62.0 km / 38.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
G4NG

Reviews

Neofiliac score
46%
50%
39%
Pros
  • Manual transmission widely available
  • Competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
  • Rather good-looking
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Sterile design
  • Some direct-injection problems
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.