Compare Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S203 vs Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon vs Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S203

Alfa Romeo 159 (939) Sportwagon

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S203Alfa Romeo 159 (939) SportwagonAlfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4
Variants
C 180
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 MT
C 200 Kompressor Euro4D
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI MT
C 240
C 240 4MATIC
C 240 MT
C 270 CDI
C 270 CDI MT
C 30 CDI AMG
C 32 AMG
C 320
C 320 4MATIC
C 320 MT
1.75 TBi
1.8 MPI
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 136PS
2.0 JTDM 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score63%46%28%
Pros
  • More modern equipment
  • Wide available with 6-speed manual transmission
  • Good powertrain reliability
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Potent engines
  • Still elegant
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lost V8 engine
  • Diesel nonsense with AMG badge
  • Not as good-looking as the sedan
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Really, really ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.