Compare Mercedes-Benz E-Class Estate S213 vs Volvo V60 II vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206

Mercedes-Benz E-Class Estate S213

Volvo V60 II

Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206

Mercedes-Benz E-Class Estate S213Volvo V60 IIMercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206
Variants
AMG E 43 4MATIC
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 EQ Boost
E 200 EQ Boost 4MATIC
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 250
E 300 EQ Boost
E 300d
E 300de PHEV
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
C 200
C 220d

Reviews

Neofiliac score87%62%32%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior design
  • Superb 9G-Tronic automatic suspension
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good for posing
Cons
  • Questionable hot-vee design for the AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Ugly indeed
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • AWD even though unnecessary

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.