Compare Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon facelift 2 vs Peugeot 508 SW vs Peugeot 308 SW II
Variants
1.6 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic
1.8 Valvematic CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.0 Valvematic CVT
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 THP
1.6 THP AT
1.6 VTi
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT
1.2 PureTech 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 102PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 PureTech AT
1.6 THP
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS 2017-2018
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177PS AT
GT 1.6 THP
GT 2.0 BlueHDi AT
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 2017-2018
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1476 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4813 mm / 189.5 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2010 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
21%
15%
Pros
- Reliable powertrain
- Improved exterior design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Much better-looking than the 407 SW
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Not ugly anymore
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.