HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate vs Renault Clio 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-4D AT
2.2 D-CAT
1.5 dCi 101PS
1.5 dCi 105PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4
1.6 107PS
1.6 112PS
1.8 120PS
1.9 dCi 100PS
1.9 dCi 107PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
2.0 136PS
GT
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 165PS
2.0 IDE 140PS
2.2 dCi 150PS
2.2 dCi 150PS AT
3.0 207PS
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
543 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 1609 L / 56.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent rear suspension
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4765 mm / 187.6 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1732 mm / 68.2 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
10%
12%
Pros
  • Improved suspension setup
  • Newer automatic transmission
  • More fuel efficient
  • Elegant styling
  • Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No fully independent suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.