Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate
Variants
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.2 Energy TCe 100PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS AT
1.3 TCe 115PS
1.3 TCe 140PS
1.3 TCe 140PS AT
1.3 TCe 160PS
1.3 TCe 160PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 95PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS AT
1.5 Energy dCi 90PS
1.6 Energy dCi 130PS
1.6 SCe 115PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
GT 1.6 Energy dCi AT
GT 1.6 Energy TCe AT
1.5 dCi 101PS
1.5 dCi 105PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4
1.6 107PS
1.6 112PS
1.8 120PS
1.9 dCi 100PS
1.9 dCi 107PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
2.0 136PS
GT
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 165PS
2.0 IDE 140PS
2.2 dCi 150PS
2.2 dCi 150PS AT
3.0 207PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent rear suspension
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4626 mm / 182.1 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1772 mm / 69.8 in
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2712 mm / 106.8 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
30%
14%
10%
Pros
- Very low fuel consumption
- Superb reliability
- More modern design
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor handling
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.