HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Renault Megane 2 Grand Tour

Variants
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.4 98PS
1.5 dCi 100PS
1.5 dCi 100PS AT
1.5 dCi 106PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 86PS
1.6 112PS
1.6 112PS AT
1.6 113PS
1.6 113PS AT
1.9 dCi 110PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
1.9 dCi 130PS
1.9 dCi 90PS
2.0 135PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4500 mm / 177.2 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2686 mm / 105.7 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
88 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Euro 5 J
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
28%
13%
Pros
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Much better looking than the sedan
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.