Compare Audi A6 Avant C6 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon vs Toyota Venza AV10 facelift

Variants
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI CVT
2.0 TDIe
2.0 TDIe CVT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI CVT
2.7 TDI
2.7 TDI CVT
2.7 TDI quattro AT
2.8 FSI 190PS
2.8 FSI 190PS CVT
2.8 FSI 190PS quattro
2.8 FSI 220PS CVT
2.8 FSI 220PS quattro AT
3.0 TDI quattro
3.0 TDI quattro AT
3.0 TFSI quattro AT
4.2 FSI quattro AT
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-4D AT
2.2 D-CAT
2.7
2.7 AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
565 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
543 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 1609 L / 56.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
67.0 L / 17.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 297 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link, trapezoidal lever
Double-wishbone
MacPherson
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
Toyota K

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
206 mm / 8.1 in
Size | Height
1463 mm / 57.6 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1610 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4927 mm / 194.0 in
4765 mm / 187.6 in
4801 mm / 189.0 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1905 mm / 75.0 in
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1631.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2843 mm / 111.9 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
ULEV-II
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2011
2009 ~ 2011
2012 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
34%
24%
Pros
  • Rather handsome design
  • Good V6 diesel engines
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Improved suspension setup
  • Newer automatic transmission
  • More fuel efficient
  • Elegant styling
  • Reliable engines
  • Simple, clean design
Cons
  • Bad CVTs
  • Least reliable FSI engine lineup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.