Compare Alfa Romeo 166 vs Audi A4 B5 facelift vs Alfa Romeo 166
Variants
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT
1.6
1.8
1.8 AT
1.8 quattro
1.8 Turbo AT
1.8T
1.8T
1.8T quattro
1.8T quattro
1.8T quattro AT
1.9 TDI 110hp
1.9 TDI 110hp quattro
1.9 TDI 116hp
1.9 TDI 116hp AT
1.9 TDI 116hp quattro
1.9 TDI 90hp
1.9 TDI 90hp AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 quattro
2.4 quattro AT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.5 TDI quattro
2.5 TDI quattro AT
2.8
2.8 AT
2.8 quattro
2.8 quattro AT
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs
510 kg / 1124 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
4720 mm / 185.8 in
4479 mm / 176.3 in
4720 mm / 185.8 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1733 mm / 68.2 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2000
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
42%
28%
Pros
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
- Multi-link + Double-wishbone for AWD models
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Lesser rear suspension setup for FWD
- Uninspiring styling
- Unreliable automatic transmission
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.