Compare Dodge Charger 7 vs Dodge Charger 6 vs Chevrolet SS Sedan
Variants
R/T 5.7
R/T 5.7 AWD
SE 3.6
SRT8 6.4
SXT 3.6 296PS
SXT 3.6 296PS AWD
SXT 3.6 305PS
SXT 3.6 305PS AWD
R/T 5.7 345PS
R/T 5.7 345PS AWD
R/T 5.7 355PS
R/T 5.7 375PS
R/T 5.7 375PS AWD
SE 2.7 181PS
SE 2.7 192PS
STR-8
SXT 3.5
SXT 3.5 AWD
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
437 L / 15.4 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1479 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
5082 mm / 200.1 in
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1891 mm / 74.4 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
3052 mm / 120.2 in
3048 mm / 120.0 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in
Performance
Top Speed
282.0 km/h / 175.2 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
68%
60%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Wonderful HEMI engines
- Great SRT8
- Beautiful design
- New 8-speed transmission
- Wonderful SRT-8
- Return of the HEMI V8
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat outdated automatic transmissions
- Questionable design choices
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.