Compare Dodge Charger 7 vs Chevrolet Impala 9 vs Chevrolet SS Sedan
Variants
R/T 5.7
R/T 5.7 AWD
SE 3.6
SRT8 6.4
SXT 3.6 296PS
SXT 3.6 296PS AWD
SXT 3.6 305PS
SXT 3.6 305PS AWD
3.5 211hp FlexFuel
3.5 212hp
3.6 300hp FlexFuel
3.9 230hp FlexFuel
3.9 245hp
5.3 303hp
5.3 SS 307hp
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
437 L / 15.4 cu-ft
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link, with stabilizer
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1851 mm / 72.9 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
3052 mm / 120.2 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
282.0 km/h / 175.2 mph
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
36%
60%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Wonderful HEMI engines
- Great SRT8
- Beautiful design
- New 8-speed transmission
- Available with small block V8
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- The "rental car" look
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.