Compare Opel Insignia A Sedan facelift vs Opel Astra H Sedan vs Chevrolet Sonic

Variants
1.4 Turbo
1.6 SIDI Turbo AT
1.6 SIDI Turbo
1.6 CDTI 120PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS AT
1.8
2.0 SIDI Turbo AWD AT
2.0 SIDI Turbo AWD
2.0 CDTI 110PS
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 120PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS AT
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 140PS
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 163PS AWD AT
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 163PS AWD
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 163PS AT
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 163PS
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 170PS
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 170PS AT
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 170PS AWD
2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 170PS AWD AT
2.0 CDTI Bi-Turbo ecoFLEX AWD AT
2.0 CDTI Bi-Turbo ecoFLEX AT
2.0 CDTI Bi-Turbo ecoFLEX
OPC 2.8 Turbo AWD
OPC 2.8 Turbo AWD AT
OPC 2.8 Turbo AWD Unlimited AT
OPC 2.8 Turbo AWD Unlimited
1.3 CDTI
1.6 115PS
1.6 115PS AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS
1.8 140PS
1.8 140PS AT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1015 L / 35.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Rigid axle
Torsion
Turning Circle
10.1 m / 33.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Delta platform

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
Size | Length
4842 mm / 190.6 in
4587 mm / 180.6 in
4399 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1479.0 mm / 58.2 in
Wheelbase
2737 mm / 107.8 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
3%
20%
Pros
  • Clean exterior design
  • More economical engine lineup
  • Not very ugly
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Basic suspension setup with MacPherson struts
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Solid axle on the back
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.