Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Acura TLX vs Acura 3.5RL
Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.4
3.5
3.5 SH-AWD
1995-2001
2001-2004
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
374 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
505 kg / 1113 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/55 R17
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
147 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1491 mm / 58.7 in
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4884 mm / 192.3 in
4834 mm / 190.3 in
Size | Width
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1603.0 mm / 63.1 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2742 mm / 108.0 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2910 mm / 114.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.28
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
C35A
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2014 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
35%
14%
Pros
- Much improved styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- 9-speed automatic transmission
- No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
- Much better 8- and 9-speed automatic transmissions
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Some styling improvements
- Proven to be very reliable
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Downgraded to MacPherson struts
- Lost manual transmission
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.