Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Volkswagen Passat B5.5 vs Volkswagen Arteon (3H)

Chrysler 200 II

Volkswagen Passat B5.5

Volkswagen Arteon (3H)

Chrysler 200 IIVolkswagen Passat B5.5Volkswagen Arteon (3H)
Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp AT
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp AT
1.9 TDI 100hp
1.9 TDI 100hp AT
1.9 TDI 130hp 4Motion
1.9 TDI 130hp 5MT
1.9 TDI 130hp 6MT
1.9 TDI 130hp AT
2.0
2.3
2.3 4Motion
2.3 AT
2.5 TDI 4Motion
2.5 TDI 4Motion AT
2.8 4Motion
2.8 4Motion AT
4.0 4Motion
4.0 4Motion AT
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DCT
2.0 BiTDI 4MOTION DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 190 4MOTION DCT
2.0 TDI 190 DCT
2.0 TSI 190 DCT
2.0 TSI 268 4MOTION AT
2.0 TSI 268 AT
2.0 TSI 272 4MOTION DCT
2.0 TSI 280 4MOTION DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%62%39%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Very interesting W8 and VR5 engine options
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good front-end design
  • Decent power output
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.