Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) vs Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Chrysler 200 II

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Chrysler 200 IIMazda 6 / Atenza (GG1)Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)
Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 136hp
2.3
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%30%48%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Sporty yet elegant design
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.