Compare Chrysler 200 II vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift

Chrysler 200 II

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift

Chrysler 200 IIMazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift
Variants
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 143hp
2.3
2.3 AT
Mazdaspeed6 (MPS)

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%42%38%
Pros
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Mazdaspeed6 option
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • Somewhat sterile inside
  • Base engines are lethargic

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.