Compare Chrysler LHS 2 vs Hyundai Sonata 8 vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
3.5
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Vented 12"
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
solid 11.2"
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Turning Circle
36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4900 mm / 192.9 in
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1890 mm / 74.4 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
6- or 8-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2001
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
37%
7%
Pros
- Lots of interior space
- Some love the quirky design
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Decent performance
- Decent exterior styling
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Uninspiring handling
- Poor reliability and build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.