HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Acura TL 4 facelift vs Citroen C5 II vs Citroen C6

Variants
3.5
3.7 SH-AWD MT
3.7 SH-AWD
1.6 120 EGS
1.6 156
1.6 156 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 110 EGS
1.6 HDi 114
1.6 HDi 114 EGS
1.8 125
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 138 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 140 Euro5
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
2.2 HDi 173
2.2 HDi 200 AT
2.7 HDi 208 AT
3.0 215 AT
3.0 HDi 240 AT
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
439 L / 15.5 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
12.4 m / 40.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
PSA PF3

Dimensions

Size | Height
1452 mm / 57.2 in
1451 mm / 57.1 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4928 mm / 194.0 in
4779 mm / 188.1 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2096 mm / 82.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.6 cu-in / 3500.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
80.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
49%
31%
52%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • New SH-AWD all-wheel drive system
  • Sweet 6-speed manual
  • Reliable V6 engines
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
  • Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
  • Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable styling
  • Fit and finish issues
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable engines
  • Interior fit and finish not the best

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.