Compare Acura TSX vs Acura TLX facelift vs Acura 3.5RL
Variants
AT
MT
2.4
3.5
3.5 SH-AWD
A-Spec 2.4
A-Spec 3.5
A-Spec 3.5 SH-AWD
1995-2001
2001-2004
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
354 L / 12.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
505 kg / 1113 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4657 mm / 183.3 in
Size | Width
1762 mm / 69.4 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1603.0 mm / 63.1 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1495.0 kg / 3295.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2910 mm / 114.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.5 sec
8.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.1 sec
7.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
215.0 km/h / 133.6 mph
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
K24A2
C35A
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
Engine | Power
203.0 hp / 151.4 kW @ 6800 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
86.2 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
225 Nm / 166.0 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2008
2017 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
37%
14%
Pros
- Good suspension setup
- Sweet manual transmission
- Fine VTEC engine
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Further styling improvements
- Proven to be very reliable
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Bad automatic transmission
- Result of badge engineering
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No manual transmission
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.