Compare Hyundai Grandeur 3 (XG)
Hyundai Grandeur 3 (XG) | |
---|---|
Variants | 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 21% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"450 L / 15.9 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"8.7 L / 9.2 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"4.5 L / 4.8 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"70.0 L / 18.5 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"5"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Disc"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Hydraulic Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"205/60 R15 V"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"11.0 m / 36.1 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"4-door Sedan"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Ground Clearance","Fv":"160 mm / 6.3 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1420 mm / 55.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4865 mm / 191.5 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1825 mm / 71.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1540.0 mm / 60.6 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1520.0 mm / 59.8 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1475.0 kg / 3251.8 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"15 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2750 mm / 108.3 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.32"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"205.0 km/h / 127.4 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"84.0 mm / 3.3 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"10.0:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6300 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"74.1 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"75.0 mm / 3.0 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"183 Nm / 135.0 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"4-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"1999 ~ 2002"}]]
Related Products
- Good double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Up-rated engines
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 36%
Acura TL 4 (UA8/UA9) 2008
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- New SH-AWD all-wheel drive system
- Reliable V6 engines
· 38%
Acura RLX (KC1/2) 2013
- Beautiful styling
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Clever AWD system
· 39%
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Reliable engine options
- Small turning circle
· 57%
- Elegantly designed
- Reliable and responsive NA engines
- New double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
· 76%
Lexus GS 3 (S190) 2005
- Robust and interesting engine lineup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
· 85%
- Good engine options
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 35%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.