Compare Hyundai Sonata 4 EF vs Hyundai Sonata 4 EF facelift vs Chrysler 300M
Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 136hp
2.0 136hp AT
2.0 147hp
2.0 147hp AT
2.4 150hp
2.4 150hp AT
2.5 160hp
2.5 175hp
2.5 175hp AT
2.5 GLS 160hp AT
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 131hp
2.0 131hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1410 mm / 55.5 in
1422 mm / 56.0 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4747 mm / 186.9 in
5000 mm / 196.9 in
Size | Width
1818 mm / 71.6 in
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
Euro 3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
10.0:1
9.9:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2001 ~ 2004
1998 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
29%
17%
Pros
- Rather good styling
- Improved styling
- New engine optinos
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only MacPherston strut front suspensions
- Outdated transmissions
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.