Compare Hyundai Sonata 4 EF vs Kia Optima vs Kia Cadenza
Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 136hp
2.0 136hp AT
2.0 147hp
2.0 147hp AT
2.4 150hp
2.4 150hp AT
2.5 160hp
2.5 175hp
2.5 175hp AT
2.5 GLS 160hp AT
1.6 T-GDI AWD
1.6T-GDI
2.0
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 LPI
2.5 T-GDI DCT
2.4 MPI
2.7 MPI 166hp
2.7 MPI 200hp
3.3 GDI 297hp
3.5 MPI 290hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/65 R16
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.8 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1410 mm / 55.5 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4965 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1818 mm / 71.6 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.27
0.29
Fuel Economy
9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
ULEV 70 - LEV III
Euro 2
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
10.5:1
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Made In
South Korea, USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
69%
38%
Pros
- Rather good styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Handsome styling
- Good handling characteristics
- Strong exterior styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust powertrain lineup
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Basic suspension setup with MacPherson front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.