Compare Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222 vs Mercedes-Benz S-class W222 vs Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222 facelift

Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222

Mercedes-Benz S-class W222

Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222 facelift

Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222Mercedes-Benz S-class W222Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222 facelift
Variants
S 600 Pullman
S 500 4MATIC
S 500
S 600
AMG S 63
AMG S 63 L 4MATIC
AMG S 65 L
S 300h BlueTEC
S 300h L BlueTEC
S 320 L
S 350 BlueTEC
S 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
S 350 L BlueTEC
S 350 L BlueTEC 4MATIC
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC
S 400 4MATIC
S 400h
S 400h L
S 500
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC 9AT
S 500 9AT
S 500 L
S 500 L 4MATIC
S 500e L
S 600 L
S 560 4MATIC
S 560
S 650

Reviews

Neofiliac score88%98%91%
Pros
  • Rather stately looking
  • Not too conspicuous
  • Great powertrain (but who cares?)
  • Superb suspension setup for comfort
  • M279 made the V12 bi-turbo even more reliable
  • Predictive MBC hydraulic suspension replaced ABC
  • Powerful and robust M278/M157 V8
  • All engines still available with RWD
  • V12 model now uses the powertrain of S65 AMG
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Somewhat understated styling
  • Superb suspension setup for comfort
Cons
  • Pullman version looks awkward
  • Generic exterior styling
  • Too many displays inside
  • V8 powertrain not changed for the better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.