Compare Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222 vs Mercedes Maybach S-Class Z223 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class W203 facelift

Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222

Mercedes Maybach S-Class Z223

Mercedes-Benz C-class W203 facelift

Mercedes-Maybach S-class X222Mercedes Maybach S-Class Z223Mercedes-Benz C-class W203 facelift
Variants
S 600 Pullman
S 500 4MATIC
S 500
S 600
S 580 4MATIC
S 680 4MATIC
C 30 CDI AMG
C 55 AMG
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI DPF
C 200 CDI DPF MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI DPF
C 220 CDI DPF MT
C 230 MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor MT US
C 230 Kompressor US
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 280 MT
C 280 4MATIC
C 280
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
C 320 CDI MT
C 320 CDI
C 350 MT
C 350 4MATIC
C 350

Reviews

Neofiliac score88%80%76%
Pros
  • Rather stately looking
  • Not too conspicuous
  • Great powertrain (but who cares?)
  • Superb suspension setup for comfort
  • Last chance to get a Mercedes V12
  • Very comfortable
  • Reintroduction of C55 AMG
  • Slightly less rusty
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Pullman version looks awkward
  • Ugly exterior styling
  • Too much focus on electronic gimmicks
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
  • Non-AMG models still looked "off"

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.