Compare Mercedes-Benz S-class W222 facelift vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S90 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-class W222 facelift

Volvo S90

Volvo S90 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-class W222 faceliftVolvo S90Volvo S90 facelift
Variants
AMG S 63 L 4MATIC
AMG S 65 L
S 350d L 4MATIC
S 350d 4MATIC
S 350d
S 350d L
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d L 4MATIC
S 400d L
S 400d
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 L 4MATIC
S 450
S 450 L
S 500 L
S 500
S 560 L 4MATIC
S 560 4MATIC
S 560 L
S 560
S 560e L
S 600 L
D3 Euro6
D3 Euro6d
D3 Euro6 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6 AT
D4 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T4 Euro6 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2018
T5 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2017
T5 254PS AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 Euro6 AWD
T6 Euro6 AWD AT
T8 AWD Hybrid
T8 AWD PHEV
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8

Reviews

Neofiliac score87%70%64%
Pros
  • The last of the M279 bi-turbo V12s
  • Return of I6 engines
  • Superb suspension setup
  • Ingenious MBC hydraulic suspension
  • Elegant exterior design
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • S63 AMG became AWD only
  • Downsized drivetrain with high turbo boost
  • Somewhat over-styled yet still generic
  • Too many electronics
  • Only available with small engines
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.