Compare Mercedes E-class W210 facelift vs Alfa Romeo 166 facelift vs Citroen C6
Variants
E 55 AMG 4MATIC
E 55 AMG
E 200 MT
E 200
E 200 CDI MT
E 200 CDI
E 200 Kompressor 163hp MT
E 200 Kompressor 163hp
E 200 Kompressor 192hp MT
E 200 Kompressor 192hp
E 220 CDI MT
E 220 CDI
E 240 2.4L MT
E 240 2.4L
E 240 2.6L MT
E 240 2.6L
E 270 CDI MT
E 270 CDI
E 280 MT
E 280 4MATIC
E 280
E 320 4MATIC
E 320
E 320 CDI
E 430 4MATIC
E 430
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft
490 L / 17.3 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
12.4 m / 40.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
PSA PF3
Dimensions
Size | Height
1416 mm / 55.7 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4818 mm / 189.7 in
4720 mm / 185.8 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2833 mm / 111.5 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
43%
52%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- M113E55 in the E55 AMG
- Robust 5G-TRONIC automatic transmission
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved exterior design
- Improved engine lineup
- Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
- Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- 4MATIC started creeping in
- RUST!
- Less well appointed than many competitors
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable engines
- Interior fit and finish not the best
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.