Compare Mercedes C-class W205 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 3 facelift vs Toyota Corolla 7
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 160
C 180 MT
C 180
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300 4MATIC
C 300
C 300de
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp
1.5
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.8
1.8 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1435 mm
Size | Length
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4640 mm
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1780 mm
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
153 ~ 155 g/km
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
1.2 - 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
82.1 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
I3 or I4 petrol w/ or w/o hybrid
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual, CVT, hybrid (eCVT)
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Debut
2018
Made In
Japan, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, USA, UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
22%
32%
Pros
- One V8 still available
- The buggy 7G-TRONIC is gone
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Very reliable engines
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- AMGs getting way over-styled
- Non-AMG cars looked generic
- 4MATIC AWD forced upon the driver
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring drive
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Not as good-looking as the hatchback
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.