Compare Mercedes-Benz C-class W205 facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-class W205 facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)

Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-class W205 faceliftMazda 3 / Axela III (BM)Mazda 6 / Atenza (GG1) facelift
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 160
C 180 MT
C 180
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300 4MATIC
C 300
C 300de
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 143hp
2.3
2.3 AT
Mazdaspeed6 (MPS)

Reviews

Neofiliac score80%35%38%
Pros
  • One V8 still available
  • The buggy 7G-TRONIC is gone
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Mazdaspeed6 option
Cons
  • AMGs getting way over-styled
  • Non-AMG cars looked generic
  • 4MATIC AWD forced upon the driver
  • No powerful engine options
  • Somewhat sterile inside
  • Base engines are lethargic

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.