Compare Mercedes C-class W205 facelift vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S40

Mercedes-Benz C-class W205 facelift Sedan (2018-2021)

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Volvo Cars | Cars

Variants

AMG C 43 4MATIC

AMG C 63 S

AMG C 63

C 160

C 180 MT

C 180

C 180d MT

C 200 4MATIC

C 200

C 200d

C 200d MT

C 220d 4MATIC

C 220d

C 300 4MATIC

C 300

C 300de

C 300e 4MATIC

C 300e

C 300d 4MATIC

C 300d

C 400 4MATIC

D3 Euro6

D3 Euro6d

D3 Euro6 AT

D3 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6

D4 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6 AT

D4 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6d AWD AT

T4 Euro6 AT

T4 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2018

T5 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2017

T5 254PS AT

T6 Euro6d AWD AT

T6 Euro6 AWD

T6 Euro6 AWD AT

T8 AWD Hybrid

T8 AWD PHEV

1.6 105hp MT

1.6 105hp AT

1.6 109hp MT

1.8 115hp MT

1.8 115hp AT

1.8 122hp MT

1.8 GDI MT

1.9D 115hp MT

1.9D 102hp MT

1.9T MT

1.9T AT

1.9D 90hp MT

2.0 136hp MT

2.0 140hp MT

2.0 140hp AT

2.0T 160hp MT

2.0T 160hp AT

2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

500 L / 17.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

Double-wishbone

Wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Helical spring

Turning Circle

12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Water Fording

250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.5 kWh (gross)

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Track Width | Rear

1558.0 mm / 61.3 in

Wheel Size

15 in

Wheelbase

2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

35.0 m / 114.8 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

88.0 mm / 3.5 in

82.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.7:1

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

82.1 mm / 3.2 in

93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

80%

70%

17%

Pros

One V8 still available
The buggy 7G-TRONIC is gone
Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup

Elegant exterior design
Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
Superb offroad capabilities
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Solid safety rating

Cons

AMGs getting way over-styled
Non-AMG cars looked generic
4MATIC AWD forced upon the driver

Only available with small engines

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Questionable design
Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.