Compare Mercedes-Benz C-class W204 facelift vs Volvo S80 II vs Volvo S40

Mercedes-Benz C-class W204 facelift

Volvo S80 II

Volvo S40

Mercedes-Benz C-class W204 faceliftVolvo S80 IIVolvo S40
Variants
C 63 AMG
C 180
C 180 CDI
C 180 CDI MT
C 180 MT
C 200
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 MT
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY MT
C 250
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI 4MATIC
C 250 CDI MT
C 300 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 4MATIC
C 350
C 350 4MATIC
C 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 63 AMG Performance
2.4D
2.4D AT
D5
D5 AT
2.5FT
2.5FT AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
3.2 AT
4.4 AT
4.4 AWD AT
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT

Reviews

Neofiliac score84%55%17%
Pros
  • Last chance to get M156 in C63 AMG
  • Somewhat improved styling
  • Reasonably reliable engine lineup
  • Good towing capacity
  • Sweet NA 4.4L V8
  • Turbo I6
  • Classy design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Solid safety rating
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.