Compare Mercedes C-class W203 facelift vs Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Mercedes CLA C117

Variants
C 30 CDI AMG
C 55 AMG
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI DPF
C 200 CDI DPF MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI DPF
C 220 CDI DPF MT
C 230 MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor MT US
C 230 Kompressor US
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 280 MT
C 280 4MATIC
C 280
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
C 320 CDI MT
C 320 CDI
C 350 MT
C 350 4MATIC
C 350
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
CLA 180
CLA 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
CLA 180 CDI
CLA 180 CDI DCT
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 CDI
CLA 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200 CDI DCT
CLA 200 CDI Euro6
CLA 200 CDI Euro6 DCT
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220 CDI DCT
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
CLA 45 AMG 4MATIC

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Coupe
4-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4630 mm / 182.3 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
39.0 m / 127.9 ft

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
76%
22%
21%
Pros
  • Reintroduction of C55 AMG
  • Slightly less rusty
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Nothing
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
  • Non-AMG models still looked "off"
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform
  • Hunchback nonsense
  • FWD
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Low build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.