HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes C-class W203 vs Volvo S80 II facelift 2 vs Volvo S40

Variants
C 30 CDI AMG
C 32 AMG
C 180 MT
C 180
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI 116hp MT
C 200 CDI 116hp
C 200 CDI 122hp MT
C 200 CDI 122hp
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor MT 02+
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor 02+
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI MT 03+
C 220 CDI 03+
C 220 CDI
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
D2
D2 AT
T4
T4 AT
T4F
T4F AT
D3
D3 AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
T5 AT
D5
D5 AT
D5 AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
455 L / 16.1 cu-ft
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Independent, spring
Helical spring
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1493 mm / 58.8 in
Size | Length
4854 mm / 191.1 in
Size | Width
1907 mm / 75.1 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2835 mm / 111.6 in

Performance

Braking | 200 km/h - 0
142.5 m / 467.4 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
59%
31%
17%
Pros
  • Rather reliable diesel engine range
  • Great 5G-TRONIC auto box
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engine choices
  • Still classy and elegant
  • Solid safety rating
Cons
  • RUST
  • Loss of V8
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not an inspiring drive
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.