Compare Porsche Panamera 970 facelift vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S80

Porsche Panamera 970 facelift Sedan (2013-2016)

Porsche | Cars

Volvo Cars | Cars

Variants

Panamera Diesel AT

Panamera PDK

Panamera 4 PDK

Panamera 4S PDK

Panamera 4S Executive PDK

Panamera GTS PDK

Panamera S E-Hybrid AT

Panamera S PDK

Panamera Turbo PDK

Panamera Turbo Executive PDK

Panamera Turbo S PDK

Panamera Turbo S Executive PDK

D3 Euro6

D3 Euro6d

D3 Euro6 AT

D3 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6

D4 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6 AT

D4 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6d AWD AT

T4 Euro6 AT

T4 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2018

T5 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2017

T5 254PS AT

T6 Euro6d AWD AT

T6 Euro6 AWD

T6 Euro6 AWD AT

T8 AWD Hybrid

T8 AWD PHEV

2.0T 163hp

2.0T 163hp AT

2.0T 180hp

2.0T 180hp AT

2.0T 226hp

2.0T 226hp AT

2.4 140hp

2.4 140hp AT

2.4 170hp

2.4 170hp AT

2.4D 130hp

2.4D 163hp

2.4D 163hp AT

2.4T 200hp

2.5D 140hp

2.8T 272hp

2.9 196hp

2.9 200hp

2.9 204hp

2.9 204hp AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

500 L / 17.7 cu-ft

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.0 deg

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

Double-wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Helical spring

Water Fording

250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity

9.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

384.0 V

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Track Width | Rear

1560.0 mm / 61.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

35.0 m / 114.8 ft

Electric Range

18.0 km / 11.2 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

82.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc

Engine | Redline

6700 rpm

Engine | Stroke

93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

82%

70%

21%

Pros

Very powerful range of engines
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup

Elegant exterior design
Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
Superb offroad capabilities
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Compact I6 engine for FWD
Sweet I5 engine options
Classy exterior design
Great safety record
Solid build quality

Cons

No more manual transmission
Too many AWD models
Downsized S model
Diesel and hybrid nonsense

Only available with small engines

Nothing exciting

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.