Compare Porsche Panamera 970 facelift vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S40

Porsche Panamera 970 facelift Sedan (2013-2016)

Porsche | Cars

Volvo Cars | Cars

Variants

Panamera Diesel AT

Panamera PDK

Panamera 4 PDK

Panamera 4S PDK

Panamera 4S Executive PDK

Panamera GTS PDK

Panamera S E-Hybrid AT

Panamera S PDK

Panamera Turbo PDK

Panamera Turbo Executive PDK

Panamera Turbo S PDK

Panamera Turbo S Executive PDK

D3 Euro6

D3 Euro6d

D3 Euro6 AT

D3 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6

D4 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6 AT

D4 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6d AWD AT

T4 Euro6 AT

T4 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2018

T5 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2017

T5 254PS AT

T6 Euro6d AWD AT

T6 Euro6 AWD

T6 Euro6 AWD AT

T8 AWD Hybrid

T8 AWD PHEV

1.6 105hp MT

1.6 105hp AT

1.6 109hp MT

1.8 115hp MT

1.8 115hp AT

1.8 122hp MT

1.8 GDI MT

1.9D 115hp MT

1.9D 102hp MT

1.9T MT

1.9T AT

1.9D 90hp MT

2.0 136hp MT

2.0 140hp MT

2.0 140hp AT

2.0T 160hp MT

2.0T 160hp AT

2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

500 L / 17.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.0 deg

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

Double-wishbone

Wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Helical spring

Water Fording

250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity

9.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

384.0 V

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Wheel Size

15 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

35.0 m / 114.8 ft

Electric Range

18.0 km / 11.2 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

82.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc

Engine | Redline

6700 rpm

Engine | Stroke

93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

82%

70%

17%

Pros

Very powerful range of engines
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup

Elegant exterior design
Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
Superb offroad capabilities
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Solid safety rating

Cons

No more manual transmission
Too many AWD models
Downsized S model
Diesel and hybrid nonsense

Only available with small engines

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Questionable design
Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.