Compare Audi RS 6 C5 (4B) vs Audi A6 C5 (4B) facelift vs Saab 9-5 II (YS3G)

Audi RS 6 C5 (4B)

Audi A6 C5 (4B) facelift

Saab 9-5 II (YS3G)

Audi RS 6 C5 (4B)Audi A6 C5 (4B) faceliftSaab 9-5 II (YS3G)
Variants
1.8T
1.8T CVT
1.8T quattro
1.9 TDI 6MT
1.9 TDI 5MT
1.9 TDI CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.4 quattro
2.4 quattro AT
2.5 TDI quattro
2.5 TDI quattro CVT
2.5 TDI 155PS
2.5 TDI 155PS CVT
2.5 TDI 163PS
2.5 TDI 163PS CVT
2.5 TDI 180PS quattro
2.5 TDI 180PS quattro AT
2.5 TDI 180PS AT
2.7T quattro
2.7T quattro AT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
4.2 V8 quattro AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.8T XWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%56%35%
Pros
  • Superb suspension setup
  • Powerful 4.2TT ahead of its time
  • Improved styling
  • Uprated engine outputs
  • Good towing capacity
  • Styling ahead of its time
  • Good fit and finish
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good appointments inside
Cons
  • Not the best styling as a sporty sedans
  • Unreliable automatic transmission
  • No manual option
  • Rather nose-heavy
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions
  • ZF 5HP improved but still unreliable
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.