HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi S6 C7 vs Audi RS 3 (8Y) Sedan vs Audi RS 3 (8V) Sedan

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 995 L / 35.1 cu-ft
321 L / 11.3 cu-ft
315 L / 11.1 cu-ft ~ 770 L / 27.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
9.8 L / 10.4 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
7.1 L / 7.5 qt
7.1 L / 7.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
610 kg / 1345 lbs
505 kg / 1113 lbs
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 375x36 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 310x22 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/40 R19
Front wheel tires: 245/35 R19 Rear wheel tires: 265/30 R19
235/35 R19 91Y, 255/30 R19 91Y
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1412 mm / 55.6 in
1397 mm / 55.0 in
Size | Length
4931 mm / 194.1 in
4542 mm / 178.8 in
4479 mm / 176.3 in
Size | Width
1874 mm / 73.8 in | 2086 mm / 82.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1851 mm / 72.9 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1802 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1592.0 mm / 62.7 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
Weight
1895.0 kg / 4177.8 lbs
1575.0 kg / 3472.3 lbs
1515.0 kg / 3340.0 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19
Front wheel rims: 8J x 19 Rear wheel rims: 9J x 19
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2916 mm / 114.8 in
2631 mm / 103.6 in
2631 mm / 103.6 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.6 sec
3.8 sec
4.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.4 sec
3.6 sec
3.9 sec
CO2 Emission
225 g/km
188 ~ 198 g/km
188 ~ 191 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.32
0.33
Fuel Economy
9.6 L/100km / 24.5 MPG (combined) | 13.4 L/100km / 17.6 MPG (urban) | 7.5 L/100km / 31.4 MPG (highway)
8.2 L/100km / 28.7 MPG (combined) | 11.1 L/100km / 21.2 MPG (urban) | 6.5 L/100km / 36.2 MPG (highway)
8.3 L/100km / 28.3 MPG (combined) | 11.3 L/100km / 20.8 MPG (urban) | 6.5 L/100km / 36.2 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6 d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6
Engine
CEUC
DNW
DAZA, DNWA
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.1:1
10.0:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.7 cu-in / 3993.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Power
420.0 hp / 313.2 kW @ 5500-6400 rpm
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 5600-7000 rpm
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 5850-7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
105.2 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
161.3 hp/L / 2.6 hp/cu-in
161.3 hp/L / 2.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
550 Nm / 405.7 lb-ft @ 1400-5200 rpm
500 Nm / 368.8 lb-ft @ 2250-5600 rpm
480 Nm / 354.0 lb-ft @ 1700-5850 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
7-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT S-tronic
Automatic S tronic
DCT S-tronic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014
2021
2017 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
54%
62%
Pros
  • Torquey V8TT engine
  • Fast 7-speed S-tronic DCT
  • Down to 4.6s 0-100kph time
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent performance
  • Exclusive access to the inline-5 engine
  • Exciting I5 TFSI engine
Cons
  • The Avant (wagon) looks better
  • Question mark on long-term reliability
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather weird proportions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No manual transmission available
  • Questionable styling (the hatchback is much better)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.